Are the courts policymakers or not Put it in the perspective of Research Paper

Are the flirts policymakers or not Put it in the perspective of judicial restraint versus judicial activism. Use relevant butterfly cases to prune your position and explain why you chose those cases - Research Paper ExampleTo demonstrate the validity of the above argument, the paper will briefly explore the United States unequivocal salute and how its rulings have shaped American policies. According to Boundless.com (2013), the Supreme Court holds the power to overturn jurisprudences and executive actions they deem unlawful or unconstitutional. This means that the court has the power to nullify a policy if it is found to be unconstitutional. Lets examine two cases from the US Supreme Court, these cases have been chosen since they originated from the highest court in the land and they touch on the highest office the governing. The case of Humphreys Executor Vs United States was decided that the president does not have the power to remove a member of an independent federal regu latory agency without the consent of Congress (Mauro, 2012). Another case is that of Nixon Vs United States in 1974 addressing the executive privilege the Supreme Court decl ared that no president is above the law (Phschool.com). From these two cases it can be safely argued that courts are policy makers as they establish checks and balances to the institution of presidency and this forms part of policy pertaining to this office. Even as the court exercises its constitutional mandate, it is critical that judicial restraint be used as opposed to judicial activism. This is because the cause emphasizes the limited nature of courts power to honor only the past precedents while the later advocates for the use of personal views in deciding cases (Slimef 2010).Personal views are known for biasness and prejudice and should not be used in deciding cases of national importance. Policy can only stand if it is supported by the law and courts are the custodians of the law hence it is safe to argu e that courts are policy makers as has